Forward (again) to 1871With all the usual “health warnings” (about leaping to conclusions), if this is the right Smith family,
in 1871 they were living in a cottage on Angel Lane. |
Charles was listed as a “woodman” and his wife a “woodman’s wife”.
The children listed in 1871 are: Walter, Eliza, John, Susanna, Jane, and David, together with a lodger called Charles Bain.
The health warning seemed unnecessary – this is the right Smith family - until I noticed that Charles
Smith’s wife is recorded in 1871 as “Mary A”.
Typical. Family trees have an unnerving habit of throwing out extra roots and false branches.
I suspect this is one such.
Without going into a detailed examination of certificates and such-like,
I was able to identify a Sudbury (District) marriage in 1868 between Charles Smith and Mary Ann Stiff.
Well, it’s possible. Several Sarah Smiths died in the Sudbury District at the relevant time – in particular one
I would like to investigate further, recorded in the December quarter of 1864.
And Tracey confirms that that is what she found, too.
(By the way, I'm saying nothing, but watch out for that surname: "Stiff", later in the story.)
|